开源日报每天推荐一个 GitHub 优质开源项目和一篇精选英文科技或编程文章原文，坚持阅读《开源日报》，保持每日学习的好习惯。

今日推荐开源项目：《page-spy-web》

今日推荐英文原文：《When to Use React Query vs useEffect for Data Fetching》

开源项目

今日推荐开源项目：《page-spy-web》传送门：项目链接
PageSpy是一个用于web项目的远程调试工具,基于对本机web API的封装，在调用时过滤和转换本机方法的参数，并转换为具有特定格式的消息供调试器客户端使用，

英文原文

今日推荐英文原文：When to Use React Query vs useEffect for Data Fetching

介绍fetching data 时 使用useEffect 和 React Query利弊，例子引入地非常好

When to Use React Query vs useEffect for Data Fetching

When it comes to fetching data in React applications, developers often face a dilemma: whether to use React Query or rely on the traditional useEffect hook.

Both approaches have their merits, and the choice depends on the specific requirements of your project.

Using useEffect for Data Fetching:

When to Use:

• Simple Data Fetching: If your application requires fetching data from an API or a server endpoint once, useEffect is a straightforward solution.
• Basic State Management: For applications with basic state management needs, where you can handle data loading, error, and success states manually, useEffect can be sufficient.

Example:

import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';  

const DataFetchingComponent = () => {  
  const [data, setData] = useState(null);  
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);  
  const [error, setError] = useState(null);  

  useEffect(() => {  
    const fetchData = async () => {  
      try {  
        const response = await fetch('/v1/data');  
        const result = await response.json();  
        setData(result);  
      } catch (error) {  
        setError(error);  
      } finally {  
        setLoading(false);  
      }  
    };  

    fetchData();  
  }, []);  

  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;  
  if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>;  
  if (!data) return <p>No data available</p>;  

  return <div>{/* Render data here */}</div>;  
};  

export default DataFetchingComponent;

Advantages:

• Simplicity: useEffect is easy to understand and implement, making it suitable for small projects or simple use cases.
• Flexibility: You have complete control over the data fetching process and can handle different states based on your requirements.

Disadvantages:

• Boilerplate Code: Handling loading, error, and success states can lead to boilerplate code, especially in larger applications.
• Limited Features: useEffect does not provide built-in caching, pagination, or query invalidation, which might be necessary for complex applications.

Using React Query for Data Fetching:

When to Use:

• Complex Data Requirements: If your application requires advanced features like caching, pagination, background data synchronization, or automatic query invalidation, React Query provides a powerful solution.
• Optimistic Updates: When you need to update the UI optimistically based on the assumption that a mutation will succeed, React Query handles this seamlessly.
• Real-time Data: For real-time applications where data changes frequently and needs to be reflected in the UI without manual polling.

Example:

import React from 'react';  
import { useQuery } from 'react-query';  

const fetchData = async () => {  
  const response = await fetch('/v1/data');  
  const data = await response.json();  
  return data;  
};  

const DataFetchingComponent = () => {  
  const { data, isLoading, isError, error } = useQuery('data', fetchData);  

  if (isLoading) return <p>Loading...</p>;  
  if (isError) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>;  
  if (!data) return <p>No data available</p>;  

  return <div>{/* Render data here */}</div>;  
};  

export default DataFetchingComponent;

Advantages:

• Automatic Caching: React Query provides automatic caching, reducing unnecessary network requests and improving performance.
• Pagination and Infinite Loading: Easily implement pagination and infinite loading with built-in features, simplifying complex UI requirements.
• Optimistic Updates: Handle UI updates optimistically, ensuring a smooth user experience even before the data is persisted on the server.
• Real-time Updates: React Query integrates seamlessly with real-time data sources, keeping the UI up-to-date with the latest changes.

Disadvantages:

• Learning Curve: React Query introduces a learning curve due to its rich feature set and configuration options, especially for beginners.
• Additional Dependency: React Query is an additional dependency that needs to be managed, which might be a concern for projects with strict size constraints.

In summary, the choice between React Query and useEffect depends on the complexity of your data fetching requirements. For simple applications with basic data fetching needs and limited states, useEffect provides a straightforward solution. However, for complex applications with requirements like caching, pagination, real-time updates, and optimistic UI, React Query offers a robust and feature-rich solution.

Understanding your project’s specific needs is crucial in making an informed decision, ensuring a seamless and efficient data-fetching experience for your users.

下载开源日报APP：https://openingsource.org/2579/
加入我们：https://openingsource.org/about/join/
关注我们：https://openingsource.org/about/love/