開源日報每天推薦一個 GitHub 優質開源項目和一篇精選英文科技或編程文章原文，堅持閱讀《開源日報》，保持每日學習的好習慣。

今日推薦開源項目：《Python-100-Days》
今日推薦英文原文：《Why You Should Stop Using Styled Components in React Apps》

開源項目

今日推薦開源項目：《Python-100-Days》傳送門：項目鏈接

Python入門課程，很全，從 python 基礎到計算機網路 到後端框架 Django 還有經典 python 爬蟲開發 最後還有機器學習模塊，大一的時候看到就好了

英文原文

今日推薦英文原文：Why You Should Stop Using Styled Components in React Apps

推薦理由：了解 現代如Sass和Tailwind 樣式風格的組件

In the world of React development, there are many tools and libraries to help with styling. One such library, styled-components, is popular because it lets you mix JavaScript with styles. But it's important to look at its downsides too. Here's a deeper dive into why you might want to consider other options like Sass and Tailwind instead.

1. Performance Overheads

Styled-components, being a runtime styling solution, dynamically injects styles into the DOM. This can bring about potential performance bottlenecks, especially in expansive applications:

  • Rendering Delays: Styled-components can lead to slight delays in rendering as styles are computed on-the-fly. In benchmark tests, styled-components lagged with a 20% slower mounting speed compared to vanilla CSS.
  • Increased JavaScript Execution: As styles are parsed and injected via JavaScript, this increases the total JavaScript execution time, potentially impacting the user experience.

2. Bundle Size Concerns

Every library added to a project impacts its bundle size:

  • JavaScript Overhead: Styled-components introduces additional JavaScript, potentially slowing down the app』s initial load time if optimizations like tree shaking aren』t employed.
  • Contrast with Alternatives: Sass gets compiled into plain CSS, meaning zero JavaScript overhead. Tailwind, being utility-centric, is tree-shakable, allowing for efficient bundling.

3. Cognitive Load and Complexity

It』s crucial to consider the development experience:

  • New Paradigms: Styled-components necessitates acclimating to a unique styling paradigm, which could be daunting for developers accustomed to standard CSS or Sass.
  • Debugging Challenges: Dynamic styling and prop-based styling can be tricky to debug, especially for those unfamiliar with the intricacies of the library.

4. Tooling and Ecosystem

The strength of a library often lies in its surrounding ecosystem:

  • Sass』s Maturity: With its longstanding history, Sass boasts mature tooling. From linters to plugins, the Sass ecosystem offers tools that optimize and enhance the development workflow.
  • Tailwind』s Rapid Growth: Despite its relative novelty, Tailwind has amassed a considerable following. Its utility-first philosophy minimizes custom CSS, fostering more consistent styling. The burgeoning Tailwind ecosystem, replete with plugins like @tailwindcss/forms and @tailwindcss/typography, facilitates rapid integrations.

The Clear Advantages of Sass and Tailwind

  1. Mature Ecosystem: Sass』s robust features — loops, variables, mixins — promote modular and maintainable styles.
  2. Peak Performance: With Sass』s compilation to vanilla CSS and Tailwind』s emphasis on minimal custom styles, both options tout optimized performance.
  3. Customizability Galore: Both Sass and Tailwind champion customization. Tailwind』s config file, for instance, empowers developers to delineate their design systems, leading to uniform, streamlined app styles.
  4. Abundant Resources: The extensive community around both Sass and Tailwind offers invaluable resources, from tutorials to plugins, addressing common challenges.
  5. Consistency and Predictability: Sass』s structured approach and Tailwind』s utility-first principle result in consistent, predictable outcomes, reducing the chances of unexpected styling behaviors.

In Conclusion

While styled-components presents a unique, JavaScript-centric styling avenue, it's paramount to juxtapose its benefits with its inherent challenges. Taking into account performance, bundle size, developer experience, and the robustness of the surrounding ecosystem, Sass and Tailwind emerge as compelling contenders. Whether you're initiating a fresh project or pondering a tech stack pivot, Sass and Tailwind merit serious consideration. They just might offer the blend of efficiency, predictability, and power you seek in a styling solution.

下載開源日報APP：https://openingsource.org/2579/
加入我們：https://openingsource.org/about/join/
關注我們：https://openingsource.org/about/love/