开源日报每天推荐一个 GitHub 优质开源项目和一篇精选英文科技或编程文章原文，坚持阅读《开源日报》，保持每日学习的好习惯。

今日推荐开源项目：《Python-100-Days》
今日推荐英文原文：《Why You Should Stop Using Styled Components in React Apps》

开源项目

今日推荐开源项目：《Python-100-Days》传送门：项目链接

Python入门课程，很全，从 python 基础到计算机网络 到后端框架 Django 还有经典 python 爬虫开发 最后还有机器学习模块，大一的时候看到就好了

英文原文

今日推荐英文原文：Why You Should Stop Using Styled Components in React Apps

推荐理由：了解 现代如Sass和Tailwind 样式风格的组件

In the world of React development, there are many tools and libraries to help with styling. One such library, styled-components, is popular because it lets you mix JavaScript with styles. But it's important to look at its downsides too. Here's a deeper dive into why you might want to consider other options like Sass and Tailwind instead.

1. Performance Overheads

Styled-components, being a runtime styling solution, dynamically injects styles into the DOM. This can bring about potential performance bottlenecks, especially in expansive applications:

  • Rendering Delays: Styled-components can lead to slight delays in rendering as styles are computed on-the-fly. In benchmark tests, styled-components lagged with a 20% slower mounting speed compared to vanilla CSS.
  • Increased JavaScript Execution: As styles are parsed and injected via JavaScript, this increases the total JavaScript execution time, potentially impacting the user experience.

2. Bundle Size Concerns

Every library added to a project impacts its bundle size:

  • JavaScript Overhead: Styled-components introduces additional JavaScript, potentially slowing down the app’s initial load time if optimizations like tree shaking aren’t employed.
  • Contrast with Alternatives: Sass gets compiled into plain CSS, meaning zero JavaScript overhead. Tailwind, being utility-centric, is tree-shakable, allowing for efficient bundling.

3. Cognitive Load and Complexity

It’s crucial to consider the development experience:

  • New Paradigms: Styled-components necessitates acclimating to a unique styling paradigm, which could be daunting for developers accustomed to standard CSS or Sass.
  • Debugging Challenges: Dynamic styling and prop-based styling can be tricky to debug, especially for those unfamiliar with the intricacies of the library.

4. Tooling and Ecosystem

The strength of a library often lies in its surrounding ecosystem:

  • Sass’s Maturity: With its longstanding history, Sass boasts mature tooling. From linters to plugins, the Sass ecosystem offers tools that optimize and enhance the development workflow.
  • Tailwind’s Rapid Growth: Despite its relative novelty, Tailwind has amassed a considerable following. Its utility-first philosophy minimizes custom CSS, fostering more consistent styling. The burgeoning Tailwind ecosystem, replete with plugins like @tailwindcss/forms and @tailwindcss/typography, facilitates rapid integrations.

The Clear Advantages of Sass and Tailwind

  1. Mature Ecosystem: Sass’s robust features — loops, variables, mixins — promote modular and maintainable styles.
  2. Peak Performance: With Sass’s compilation to vanilla CSS and Tailwind’s emphasis on minimal custom styles, both options tout optimized performance.
  3. Customizability Galore: Both Sass and Tailwind champion customization. Tailwind’s config file, for instance, empowers developers to delineate their design systems, leading to uniform, streamlined app styles.
  4. Abundant Resources: The extensive community around both Sass and Tailwind offers invaluable resources, from tutorials to plugins, addressing common challenges.
  5. Consistency and Predictability: Sass’s structured approach and Tailwind’s utility-first principle result in consistent, predictable outcomes, reducing the chances of unexpected styling behaviors.

In Conclusion

While styled-components presents a unique, JavaScript-centric styling avenue, it's paramount to juxtapose its benefits with its inherent challenges. Taking into account performance, bundle size, developer experience, and the robustness of the surrounding ecosystem, Sass and Tailwind emerge as compelling contenders. Whether you're initiating a fresh project or pondering a tech stack pivot, Sass and Tailwind merit serious consideration. They just might offer the blend of efficiency, predictability, and power you seek in a styling solution.

下载开源日报APP：https://openingsource.org/2579/
加入我们：https://openingsource.org/about/join/
关注我们：https://openingsource.org/about/love/