今日推薦開源項目：《BiliBiliTool》
今日推薦英文原文：《Google scientists reportedly told to make AI look more 'positive' in research papers》
今日推薦開源項目：《BiliBiliTool》傳送門：項目鏈接
推薦理由：BiliBiliTool不僅可以自動完成每日任務， 投幣，點贊，直播簽到，自動兌換銀瓜子為硬幣，自動送出即將過期禮物，漫畫App簽到，大會員領取B幣卷等。每天獲得65點經驗，助你快速升級到Lv6。 另外，通過結合GitHub Actions，可以實現每天線上自動運行，只要部署一次，小助手就會在背後一直默默地幫我們完成我們預先布置的任務。還有其他一些小功能，比如漫畫簽到、直播簽到等等。
今日推薦英文原文：《Google scientists reportedly told to make AI look more 'positive' in research papers》作者：Corinne Reichert
原文鏈接：https://www.cnet.com/news/google-scientists-reportedly-told-to-make-ai-look-more-positive-in-research-papers/
推薦理由：路透社周三的報道稱，谷歌母公司Alphabet一直要求其科學家確保人工智慧技術在他們的研究論文中看起來更加 "積極"。據報道，一項新的審查程序已經到位，因此研究人員在探討人臉分析以及種族、性別和政治背景等問題之前，會諮詢谷歌的法律、政策或公關團隊，進行 "敏感話題審查"。
Google scientists reportedly told to make AI look more 'positive' in research papers
Google parent Alphabet has been asking its scientists to ensure that AI technology looks more "positive" in their research papers, says a Wednesday report by Reuters. A new review procedure is reportedly in place so researchers consult with Google's legal, policy or PR teams for a "sensitive topics review" before exploring things like face analysis, and racial, gender and political affiliation."Advances in technology and the growing complexity of our external environment are increasingly leading to situations where seemingly inoffensive projects raise ethical, reputational, regulatory or legal issues," one of the internal webpages on the policy says, according to Reuters.
Other Google authors were told to "take great care to strike a positive tone," internal correspondence shared with Reuters said.
The report follows Google CEO Sundar Pichai earlier this month apologizing for the handling of artificial intelligence researcher Timnit Gebru's departure from the company and saying it would be investigated. Gebru left Google on Dec. 4, saying she'd been forced out of the company over an email sent to co-workers.
The email criticized Google's Diversity, Equity and Inclusion operation, according to Platformer, which posted the full text of her missive. Gebru said in the posted email that she'd been asked to retract a research paper she'd been working on, after receiving feedback on it.
"You're not supposed to even know who contributed to this document, who wrote this feedback, what process was followed or anything," she wrote in the email. "You write a detailed document discussing whatever pieces of feedback you can find, asking for questions and clarifications, and it is completely ignored.
"Silencing marginalized voices like this is the opposite of the NAUWU principles which we discussed. And doing this in the context of 'responsible AI' adds so much salt to the wounds," she added. NAUWU stands for "nothing about us without us," the idea that policies shouldn't be made without input from the people they affect.
Google didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
下載開源日報APP：https://openingsource.org/2579/
加入我們：https://openingsource.org/about/join/
關注我們：https://openingsource.org/about/love/
